Xxx 20 y u norah
(doi:10.7551/978-0-262-32621-6-ch091) In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems (ALIFe 14).
Hiroki Sayama, John Rieffel, Sebastian Risi, René Doursat and Hod Lipson (Eds.).
It is apparent from the foregoing that appellants were at or near the crime scene during the rape incidents and that it was not physically impossible for them to be at the crime scene during the rape incidents.
Having failed to comply with the requirements of the law for an alibi to prosper, appellants respective alibis, though corroborated by other defense witnesses, cannot serve as basis for their acquittal.
Downloadable papers are preprint versions which usually don't correspond exactly to the revised versions published.
22(2):172-184 (2016) Christoph Flamm, Daniel Merkle, Peter F Stadler, Uffe Thorsen Automatic Inference of Graph Transformation Rules: Using the Cyclic Nature of Chemical Reactions.
City Prosecutors Office did not conduct preliminary investigation prior to the filing of the present cases; that they did not receive any subpoena as regards the said preliminary investigation; and that the RTC judge, Judge Myrna Thereafter, two subpoenas for the said investigation, dated 22 November 1999 (for the 3 December 1999 schedule) and 3 December 1999 (for the 17 December 1999 schedule), were sent by Prosecutor Yu to appellants at the latters CIDG office.
Appellants claim that they did not receive said subpoenas in the CIDG office does not inspire belief because they were active, on-duty police officers at the CIDG during the period of November and December 1999.
All papers are copyrighted by the authors; revised versions that appeared in print are copyrighted by the respective publisher.The same provision also states that the death penalty shall be imposed if the victim was raped while under the custody of the police authorities, or, when the rape is committed by any member of the Philippine National Police (PNP) or any law enforcement agency.It is settled that the aggravating/qualifying circumstances be expressly and specifically alleged in the information, otherwise they cannot be appreciated, even if they are subsequently proved during the trial.Jurisprudence instructs that when the credibility of a witness is of primordial consideration, as in this case, the findings of the trial court, its calibration of the testimonies of the witnesses and its assessment of the probative weight thereof, as well as its conclusions anchored on said findings, are accorded respect if not conclusive effect.
Appellants argued that the said finding and ruling of the RTC violated their constitutional rights to be informed of the nature of the case against them, to be presumed innocent of the charges, and to due process. As such, the time or place of commission in rape cases need not be accurately stated.
(doi:10.1007/978-3-319-40530-8_5) 11(3-4):185-203 (2015) Yu-Ting Hsiao, Wei-Po Lee, Wei Yang, Stefan Müller, Christoph Flamm, Ivo L Hofacker, Philipp Kügler Practical Guidlines for Incorporating Knowledge-Based and Data-Driven Strategies into the Inference of Gene Regulatory Networks.